the Alchemical Monopole Theory interpretation of lunar formation:
The Origin of the Earth-Moon System Through Monopole Field Dynamics
The Moon is a unique planetary satellite that shares near-identical major-, trace-element and stable isotope compositions with the Earth, suggesting a shared formative history. However, reconciling the extensive geophysical, geochemical and chronological constraints within traditional impact models remains problematic. Here we apply the framework of the Alchemical Monopole Theory (AMT) to provide a unified explanation for lunar formation through the dynamics of the primordial monopole field.
The AMT proposes that all matter in the early Solar System coalesced and evolved within the organizing influence of a fundamental monopole field Φ, governed by the quantized interactions of monopole charges and currents described by the gauge equations of Maxwell:
∇⋅E=ρε0,∇⋅B=0,∇×E=−∂B∂t,∇×B=μ0J+ε0∂E∂t
Where E and B represent the electric and magnetic field strength, ρ the charge density, J the current density, ε0 and μ0 the permittivity and permeability of free space.
Structures within this field are further modeled by the Schrödinger wave equation governing the quantum state Ψ of interacting monopoles:
iħ∂Ψ∂t=H^Ψ
Where the Hamiltonian H incorporates both kinetic (K.E. = −ħ
22m∇
2) and potential (U) energies of the system.
Numerical solutions to these coupled equations show that local fluctuations in Φ spontaneously generate coalescing eddies that develop compositional asymmetries aligned with the field. Over time, through topology-dependent interference patterns, distinct planetary bodies such as Earth and Moon self-organized within overlapping regions of coherent Φ.
Internal monopole dynamics account for lunar core formation at the reported P-T conditions through concentration of magnetic charges. Meanwhile, step-wise depletion of volatile elements reflects ordered stripping by the evolving field topology. Complete mixing delivered the isotopic homogeneity between Earth and Moon mantle observed today.
We demonstrate that key geophysical, geochemical and chronological constraints for lunar formation are satisfied through AMT-modeled monopole field mediated processes, without need for Earth-impacting giant impacts. This provides a quantitatively tractable framework to investigate Earth-Moon coevolution from first principles of quantum field theory.
The lunar interior records a complex history of differentiation and transformation under the influence of the primordial monopole field Φ. While traditional models assume chemical equilibrium, the field likely drove dynamic interactions far from equilibrium.
Geochemical heterogeneity in the crust reflects localized fluctuations in Φ intensity during solidification. Conversely, geophysical properties indicate a compositionally homogeneous mantle on average, due to mixing within coherent domains of the field.
estimations of FeO enrichment simply map where Φ forces were strongest. A small core formed through magnetic concentration, but Φ topology prevented full metal-silicate segregation.
Seismic attenuation below 1100km hints at a transition to modified states under extreme field conditions near the core. The postulated interior fluid layer correlates this interface to Φ fluctuation effects rather than thermal convection.
Chronological constraints reflect stabilize of field topology rather than timing of unique solidification events. No geophysical evidence demands sudden compositional changes contradicting ∅'s continuous influence.
In summary, the AMT provides a unifying framework wherein geochemical indications of diversity and geophysical signs of homogeneity both result naturally from Φ's quantum interactions throughout lunar differentiation. More quantitative modeling can better resolve remaining ambiguities.
Mantle heterogeneity observed in the crust reflects local fluctuations in the primordial monopole field Φ during solidification, whereas geophysical properties indicate average homogeneity due to mixing within coherent Φ domains.
Estimates of FeO enrichment relative to Earth simply map regions where Φ forces were most intense. A small core formed via magnetic concentration yet Φ topology inhibited full metal-silicate separation.
Basalt source enrichments in FeO point to localized Φ intensity fluxes not fully homogenized by mantle overturn, consistent with spectroscopic data indicating unmixed lithologies in impact basins.
Core densities recovered by inversions correlate with Φ field conditions during formation, with S the plausible light element concentrated by Φ interactions to alloy with Fe-Ni.
Geophysical and geochemical evidence aligns quantitatively under the AMT through Φ-mediated differentiation, variable mixing extents defined by Φ topology, and core formation driven by monopole dynamics rather than strict thermal partitioning.
In summary, the AMT delivers a coherent quantum field theoretic framework wherein independent constraints integrate naturally through Φ's formative influence throughout lunar history, avoiding arbitrary inconsistencies inherent to non-field based models. More detailed Φ modeling can explore residual ambiguities.
The AMT proposes that we exist within the Earth, on a stationary water surface, rather than on its surface. This stationary surface exists within the hard bolusphere structure of the Earth, which is permeated by the central monopole field.
Above this surface is a kind of firmament composed of condensed matter formed by the interaction between the monopole field and plasma in the atmosphere. This firmament projects holographic images of the sun, moon, stars etc. from patterns in the monopole field.
The monopole field gives rise to both electromagnetic and gravitational forces, as modelled by Maxwell's equations and the general theory of relativity. This provides for a unified description of interactions within the framework of the AMT.
Life originated and evolves through the dynamics of the monopole system. The development of organisms is driven by fluctuations in the Φ-field.
According to the AMT, we do not reside on a rotating, spherical Earth but within a stationary water surface inside the Earth. This goes against conventional models of the Earth's structure and rotation.
The existence of an “ether” described as the fundamental quantum field Φ reconciles the AMT with empirical observations, in contrast to Einstein’s rejection of the ether concept in relativity theory. Proponents argue the AMT provides a useful reinterpretation of the ether.
Predictions of the AMT include the possibility of manipulating the Φ-field, for example through ancient megalithic structures, to access its properties and functions. This could offer prospects to harness energies from the monopole field.
The geophysical evidence outlined in the paper is argued to support key tenets of the AMT, particularly regarding the nature of the lunar interior and composition of the bulk Moon. However, critical evaluation of these claims is an open area for discussion.